Aleksei Cherepanow (anarchista z Krasnodara) został ofiar± politycznej represji kiedy policja, szukaj±c pretekstu żeby go aresztować, nielegalne przeszukała jego dom i podrzuciła tam narkotyki.
19 sierpnia, s±d wycofał
oskarżenie przeciwko Aleksejowi, uznaj±c je za bezpodstawne. W końcu, władza
przyznala się do winy. 20.09. Gosnarkontrol napisał list do Czerpanowa z
pro¶b± o wybaczenie dla tego "wykroczenia" ze strony oficerów Gosnarkontrola
i powiedzieli że oni zostali ukarani.

Jednak, 22.09, władza zaczeła nowy, kryminalny proces przeciw Aleksejowi na
postawie apelu Prokuratora. Oczywi¶cie, ta sprawa ma charakter polityczny.
Dalej jest kopia listu, który możesz wy¶lać do Prokuratora. Lepiej wysłać
ten list po rosyjsku je¶li możecie. (Tekst zaczyna się od daty 4 listopada.)
http://russia.indymedia.org/front.php3?art...3&group=webcast
Numer faksu: +7-8612 62 52 56 z notatk± "Dla Czerepanowa". Według prawa,
je¶li dostaj± faksy z imeniem, adresem, zawodem i podpisem, oni musz± dać
wam opowiedĽ, więc damy im trochę pracy z tego powodu.



4) A fax you may send to help Aleksei Cherepanov
> >
> You may fax this appeal to Sovetski district court of Krasnodar.
> However, it will propably me more effective, if
> instead of this English version you send the Russian version
> from russia.indymedia.org (right colon on the top, if they have
> delays in publishing check after few hours)
> >
> According to Russian laws, appeals which contain your full name, home
> address, profession and signature MUST be given an official answer. So if
> you all
> send Russian version of the fax and add all this information, your faxes
> make
> Sovetski district court of of Krasnodar area to remember Cherepanov case
> for
> long!
> >
> Sovetski district court of Krasnodar does not have a direct fax, but you
> fax to number +7-8612 62 52 56 every day from 10 AM to 4 PM local
> time (from 7 AM to 1 PM GMT), and say that fax is for Cherepanov.
> >
> Ňî district court of Sovetski of Krasnodar
> to judge Yuri Alekseyevich Lapkin
> 350058, Krasnodar, Stavropolskaya street 207
> >
> Dear Yuri Alekseyevich
> >
> 19th of August 2004 judge of Sovetski district court of Krasnodar V.G.
> Khraban cleared Aleksei Aleksandrovich Cherepanov from all charges given
> according to statue 228 of Criminal Codex of Russian Federation. However,
> representative of prosecutor of the area T.N. Zvereva appealed decision of
> court to Court of Appeal, pleaing to overturn sentence and to pass case to
> a
> new investigation.
> >
> 22nd of September court collegium on criminal cases of Court of Appeal
> looked appeal and passed criminal case against Aleksei Cherepanov to a new
> investigation, without any justification whatsoever!
> >
> Judges did not paid attention to number of violations, which officers of
> Gosnarkokontrol had committed during investigation and which were
> mentioned
> in sentence of
> the district court. Judges also did not paid attention to number of
> violations of both
> Constitution of Russian Federation and Criminal Process Code in the appeal
> itself.
> >
> For example, appeal admits that search in the room where Cherepanov was
> living was done in contradiction with laws since not he, nor his wife were
> present,
> although both were in the city at the moment and officers of
> Gosnarkokontrol knew
> about their whereabouts. It is also proven that 16th of April 2004 an
> operative
> group, consisting of five officers of Gosnarkokontrol, was founded to work
> on Cherepanov - although he is claimed to have been arrested for a
> misdemeanour
> charge only 12th of May. Chief of Administratio of Gosnarkokontrol in
> Krasnodar
> area M.M. Krapiviy has begged pardon from Cherepanov in a written for for
> illegal actions of his subordinates. We suppose, that judges were under
> pressure from side of representatives of
> the prosecutor of the area. Fact that prosecutor of the area was leading
> such an unimportant case is evidence for our assumption. It was prosecutor
> of the area who demanded remand imprisonement of Cherepanov, although he
> has no previous criminal history, has not been avoiding
> investigation and has a permanent residence in Krasnodar, in these
> conditions persons accused with such charges are seldom put to remand
> prison.
> >
> We are sure, that Aleksei Cherepanov has not committed this crime. We are
> aware of political
> activities of Aleksei Cherepanov, and we are sure that this case has a
> political aspect.
> >
> We ask you to take into account all these facts when looking for the case,
> and make a just decision.
> >
> Signatures








> Contents:
> 1) Current situation
> 2) A letter from Aleksei Cherepanov (31st of August, 2004)
> 3) A letter from regional administration of Gosnarkokontrol of Kuban
> area to Aleksei Cherepanov (20th of September, 2004)
> 5) A fax you may send to help Aleksei Cherepanov
> 1) Very recently we heard, that Sovetsky district court of Krasnodar
> will be looking case of Cherepanov already 11th of November!
> In September, appeal court of Krasnodar area overturned decision
> of Sovetsky district court which cleared Cherepanov from all charges after
> appeal of the prosecutor, in a very dubious and illegal manner. Now
> Sovetsky
> district court is looking the case again, even although appeal against
> decision
> of the appeal court is still pending. We must react quickly!
> In end of this letter, you will see a sample fax which you may
> send to Sovetsky district court of Krasnodar in order to support
> Cherepanov.
> >
> >
> 2) A letter from Aleksei Cherepanov (31st of August, 2004)
> >
> Hello comrades!
> >
> BIG thank you once again to all of you for support and care!
> ...
> Right now it is alreay for sure, that everything what happened was a
> provocation of FSB in order to open a criminal case against me and Dima
> (Ryabinin - ed.) according to statue 280 of Criminal Codex of Russian
> Federation, "A call to overthrow constitutional order", Avtonom being the
> main target. From the first day, 12th of May, when I was planted grass on
> my
> way to military call-up centre, everything was made according to demands
> of
> the FSB. Feces (Fekaly is a popular in Russia nick for secret service
> agents - ed.) gave oral orders to Gosnarkokontrol (GNK) to plant the drugs
> and to have be locked up. In unofficial personal chat with my lawyer, one
> of the
> chiefs of GNK in Krasnodar admitted, that during search of my home 19th of
> May drugs were not planted by his group, but by FSB. And investigator of
> FSB
> Bessonov said to my lawyer, that drugs were planted to back up their
> business.
> He also said, that they wanted to open criminal case according to statue
> 280 -
> that is why I was locked up to FSB remand prison. But they had to forget
> about
> the case, since they learned that I wrote and defended my diplom work
> "Youth
> radical publications - historical and typological characteristics" with
> references to this literature.
> >
> They were moronic enough to pass my diplom work to criminal expertise in
> order to find "extremist calls" from it! So that damn diplom work which
> saved me! According to words of this fece, they checked up my
> friends and made a conclusion that I am an anarchist, involved
> in subversive extremist activities, but they also found out that I am
> doing scientifical work as well. According to his words: "We made a
> mistake and picked up something that we should not had to, and now all
> these
> complaints and faxes from Moscow tie our hands". When my lawyer asked if
> they understood what they were doing in the first place, Bessonov answered
> "So you want to say that our officers are pissheads? You don't have to, I
> know it myself."
> >
> Bessonov was also talking about fanzine Krolik, which I publish, and said
> that whatever, it is will not be a fair business with me since I am a
> dissident.
> >
> Problems with Dima (Ryabinin - ed.) in prior to his liberation were also
> anything but a coincidence. He was passed from low-security colony of
> Dvubratska to Ust-Labinsk, where FSB should have
> picked him up according to chief of Dvubratska. It seems like FSB wanted
> to
> have both me and Dima accused as an extremist group according to 280,
> "publishing subversive literature with call to overthrow existing order".
> Feces withdrew from their plans 2nd of July, when my advocate had passed
> them testimony
> from my institute that I was indeed writing a diplom work using the
> confiscated press.
> >
> Feces sticked to me, since lately issues of Avtonom* have been stored in
my
> place, and 20th issue was also stapled there.
> I suppose FSB learned this from informer Zhenya Hatkin, who gave testimony
> against Dima on his case, and who for
> sure still cooperates with feces. I am sure, that Zhenya would have been
> key
> witness in case they opened a case
> according to 280. By the way, criminal expertise made a conclusion that
> press confiscated from me was indeed of extremist character, but since I
> was
> not publishing but studying this literature, they decided not to open the
> case. This was thanks to my diplom work.
> >
> Differently from Dima's case, feces were not putting pressure to court
> during myh case, according to their words "they had no quarrel with me".
> But
> an unimportant fece was monitoring court sessions all
> the time. And GNK found itself deep in the arse, since they made untidy
> work
> expecting FSB to make the job in which
> drugs will go by without too much attention. But FSB refused from the
> case,
> and GNK was alone with its stupid statue 228
> and unproved accusations about drug possession.
> >
> Coincidentally, my lawyer heard one of the high-rank officers of the GNK
> talking to a fece in the corridoor of the courthouse:"You bitches fucked
> us
> up!", to which fece answered calmly "And what are you guys licking our
> arses
> after oral orders only?". And indeed, formally FSB has nothing to do with
> it, there is no any written proof whatsoever that they were in the
> business
> from the beginning. Confiscated literature was passed to GNK in accordance
> with statue 155 of theCriminal Codex of the Russian Federation (a
> citation:
> "Passing materials to
> a separate investigation: If during investigation information about
> another
> crime, which is not connected with the currently investigated crime,
> appears, investigator separates materials that may containt testimony
> about
> the new case from
> materials of the current investigation.")
> >
> I am still surprised, that during all time of my imprisonement feces did
> not
> came to visit me. No question, I would not have had any chat with them,
> but
> they would have put me in front of a choice - have a talk or we will give
> you a
> ride with the drugs and ammunition charges with a full program.
> >
> By the way, before all these problems began, feces were pretty much
> interested about me, asking questions from teachers of the institute and a
> couple of times they came to my home when I was not around. So in case FSB
> is specially interested about somebody, one may wait provocations against
> this comrade to come up soon. As a conclusion, one should not
> relax but be prepared to new provocations.
> >
> Struggle continues! FSB is enemy of the people!
> Once again HUGE thanks to everybody!
> >
> Aleksei Cherepanov
> >
> 3) A letter from regional administration of Gosnarkokontrol of Kuban
> area to Aleksei Cherepanov
> >
> We announce, that circumstances around Your punishment for a misdemeanour
> and consecutive arrest have been throughouthly investigated with respect
> to
> all their aspects. During this investigation we have uncovered violations
> from side of the officers of the administration under my governance. Those
> guilty of misdemeanour have been punished. I beg you pardon for actions of
> my subordinates.
> >
> Chief of Administration M.M. Krapivniy 20th of September 2004
> >

w zasadzie mogłe¶ lepiej oznaczyc gdzie sie zaczyna tersc faxu, ale nie ważne... czy to ponowne ¶lectwo tez jest pod tym samym zarzutem?

ja ten tekst ¶ci±gn±łem ? o to link http://alteree.hardcore.lt/anarchoflash/index.php?artid=132

bym się nie zdziwił jak by było pod tym samym zarzutem

tiiia, słuchajcie, a jak nie mam faksu, to wystarczy ten adres, który jest ze ¶ci±gnietym tekstem?

poza tym, gdzie się w końcu ten tekst zaczyna? niby od daty 4 list., ale ja jej nie widzę

no faktycznie też nie umiem tego znaleĽć

4 ноября 2004 г.

Уважаемый Юрий Алексеевич!

19 августа 2004 г. в отношении Черепанова Алексея Александровича, обвиняемого
по статье 228, часть 1 УК РФ, судья Советского районного суда г.Краснодара Храбан В.Г.
вынес вполне обоснованный оправдательный приговор за непричастностью к совершению преступления. Однако, 22 сентября 2004 года судебная коллегия по уголовным делам краевого суда направила уголовное дело в отношении Черепанова Алексея на повторное рассмотрение.

Принимая решение, судьи краевого суда проигнорировали множество процессуальных нарушений, совершенных сотрудниками Госнаркоконтроля, которые были изложены в оправдательном приговоре. Судьи также не обратили внимание на то, что в кассационном представлении прокуратуры подтверждается нарушение сотрудниками Госнаркоконтроля Конституции РФ и УПК. Например, в кассационном представлении указано, что обыск в комнате, где проживал Черепанов, происходил в отсутствие его и его жены, несмотря на то, что они присутствовали в городе и сотрудники Госнаркоконтроля знали об их местонахождении. Это является нарушением УПК. В представлении сообщается, что 16 апреля 2004 года в отношении Черепанова создана оперативная группа из пяти сотрудников Госнаркоконтроля; но согласно материалам дела Черепанов был «случайно» задержан на улице только 12 мая. Это подтверждает «заказной» характер дела.

Кроме того, руководитель Управления Госнаркоконтроля по Краснодарскому краю
Крапивный М.М. принес Черепанову письменные извинения за незаконные действия
своих сотрудников, которые легли в основу уголовного дела. Но не конкретизировал, какие именно действия были незаконными.

Мы предполагаем, что на судей краевого суда было оказано давление представителями прокуратуры края. Наши предположения подтверждаются в том числе тем, что такое незначительное дело курировалось краевой прокуратурой. В частности, прокуратура края настаивала на содержании Черепанова под стражей, несмотря на то, что ранее он не был судим, общественно не опасен, от следственных действий не уклонялся и постоянно проживает в г.Краснодаре; при вышеизложенных обстоятельствах обвиняемых обычно оставляют на свободе под подпиской о невыезде.

Мы уверены в том, что Алексей Черепанов не причастен к совершению данного преступления. Мы наслышаны об общественной деятельности Черепанова и уверены, что его дело носит заказной и политический характер.

Просим Вас при рассмотрении дела принять во внимание вышеизложенные обстоятельства и вынести справедливое решение

to jest chyba to

dzięki. tyle tylklo, że bedę musiał chyba porównać to z tekstem angielskim i wstawić tego 4 listopada w odpowiednie miejsce (nie wiem jak, bo rosyjskich znaczków to ja nie znam). word mój nie czyta, notatnik pewnie też. a ajk inaczej miałbym to skopiować, zmagazynować u mnie? gdzie można ¶ci±gn±ć rosyjskie literki?

W necie dosteony jest soft do sciagania i wysylania faxow. Faxy przychodza na zdefiniowana skrzynke e-mail... no a numer... to juz trzeba miec.
Tak dziala fax ALFu wlasnie, za pomoca oprogramowania jest on czytany.
Generalnie, moglbym podac dostep do mojego panelu, z tym, ze pozniej moglbym miec zmienione haslo...
No, wyslalem juz.



Pozdrawiam,
Swiety Mikolaj

Czy ktos ma moze namiary na takie oprogramowanie. Bardzo by nam sie przydalo do rozsylania informacji o akcjach.

Oki, no ja mam - ale wiesz, tam podajesz wlasne dane, chyba lepiej zalatwic ta spraw na priv? Jesli chcesz, to pomoge Tobie rowniez zdobyc numer faxu, ale to nie tu, a na priv!!!



Pozdrawiam,
sniety...